Simone Biles has made her views known on killing unborn babies, what euphemistically is called being “pro-choice.” She asked her Instagram followers to share “unpopular” opinions. Some brave soul responded with the opinion that “abortion is wrong,” and Biles responded. The following is from The Christian Post
“I already know this is going to start the biggest argument & may even lose followers BUT I’m very much pro-choice.” “Your body … your choice,” she added, reciting a famous slogan of the pro-choice movement.
The Texas native who was in the foster system as a child also delivered a message to those inclined to respond to her argument by saying, “just put it up for adoption.”
“Also for everyone gonna say ‘just put it up for adoption’ it’s not that easy & coming from someone who was in the foster care system,” she added, according to USA Today. “TRUST me foster care system is broken & it’s TOUGH especially on the kids & young adults who age out & adoption is expensive … I’m just saying.
In addition to characterizing adoption as “expensive,” Biles told her followers, “Don’t even come at me if you couldn’t keep a mask on or refused to wear one.”
My questions would be, why is killing unborn babies OK and enslaving black people is not OK? What standard are you using to support being pro-abortion and anti-slavery? “If we are all biological accidents, why shouldn’t the white accidents own and sell the black accidents?”[1] She might say that a slave is a sovereign individual who can’t be bought and sold. Says who and by what standard? See my article “You’re a White Supremacist If You Don’t Believe in Evolution.”
We differ on this and other topics because of our starting point, as Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen explains in the following:
But how can we argue if there are different ultimate presuppositions? What’s the answer? Transcendentally. What provides the preconditions for the intelligibility of any argument?
